June 13, 2005
~*Cut + Paste Vs Digital Collage*~

Can you tell which is digital and which is cut +
paste?
I found myself responding to an email tonight about my collages. I started
off on this vent about how I feel that if people know which of my collages are
digital and which are cut + paste they will see them differently.
Some of my collages are cut + paste, and others are
digital. I strive very hard to make sure that people, for the most part, can
not tell which is which. I feel that if I point out which ones are the digital
collages, people will look at them differently, diminishing. I feel that when
people ask if it is digital or not, if I say digital they will not like it, will
not think that it is as worthy as a cut + paste . A digital collage still
takes me hours sometimes, to make things the way I want them, and I never use
any special effects. Just piecing the pieces of vintage paper together with my
mouse rather than glue. Does that make sense? I just do not want people to say
"oh, that's easy, anyone can do it in Photoshop" because it is more than that!
I go through phases where I prefer one type of collaging
over the other... right now it is digital. But then I start to miss the smell
and feel of the glue and I am back, hooked on cut + paste. What do you think?
Does it make a piece of mine less good if you knew it was digital? Is
digital collage diminishing? Am I not really good at collage if I make a
digital collage? Or am I just crazy?
P.S. I updated my links page - a new look -
check it out here
and let me know what you think!
File Under:
creations
|